We will not landfill a whole container
Not one. If the bottle is finished, the cage is not. If the cage is finished, the steel is not. There is always a step above the hole in the ground, and taking it is the entire job.
Commitments written as refusals, because a refusal is the only kind of commitment that costs you something.
Not one. If the bottle is finished, the cage is not. If the cage is finished, the steel is not. There is always a step above the hole in the ground, and taking it is the entire job.
A grade is a promise about the next five years. If we cannot show you the eighteen checks behind it, the letter is marketing and we will not print it.
Not because it looks clean. Not because it probably is. Food grade means a documented history, a validated cycle and a certificate with a name on it.
Some residues belong with a licensed processor, not in our bay. Turning down that work costs us money and keeps our water honest.
Our diversion rate counts containers that actually left the yard reused, rebuilt, repurposed or recycled. Totes sitting in inventory count as nothing.
2017 was 91%, and the reason is written down. A sustainability number you only publish when it flatters you is not a number, it is an advertisement.
Cutting voids it. Grinding the plate off ends it. We say so plainly even when the customer would rather we did not.
Only the final rinse gets potable water. Everything else runs on the loop, which is why we use about four gallons of fresh water per container instead of sixty.
No hold music, no extensions, no 'your call is important to us'. Everything in writing, answered by the people who do the work, usually the same day.
A commitment with no cost attached is a slogan. Each of the nine has a price, and each one can be audited — here is both.
| # | The refusal | What it costs us | How to check it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | No whole container landfilled | Granulating and baling instead of skipping | Granulator weights, mill bale tickets |
| 02 | No grade we cannot inspect | 2–4 minutes of grading per container | Intake photographs against the grade call |
| 03 | No food-grade claim without paperwork | Lost sales to looser sellers | Cycle logs and lab results by wash lot |
| 04 | No washing what should not be washed | About 7% of inbound enquiries refused | The published refusal list and quarantine records |
| 05 | No counting reuse we did not do | A diversion figure lower than competitors' | Diversion worksheet for any quarter |
| 06 | No hiding a bad year | A permanent 91% in the archive | The 2017 report, still unedited |
| 07 | No pretending a cut container keeps its rating | Arguments with customers who wanted otherwise | Serial records on modified units |
| 08 | No fresh water where recovered works | A capital project nobody asked for | Metered make-up versus cycle volumes |
| 09 | No phone tree | Customers who would rather call | This page, and the absence of a number anywhere |
Nine refusals and nine commitments, all auditable. Ask for the audit packet with the period you want to examine.
It lists nine refusals, such as no landfilling a whole container, no grade the yard cannot inspect and no food grade claim without paperwork. It also lists nine things the yard will always do, all of them auditable.
Yes. The page says four customers have audited some version of the list on site, and the yard hosts an audit on any weekday morning with records out on a table. You can request the audit packet through the form.
Some residues belong with a licensed processor, not in the wash bay. The page says about 7 percent of inbound enquiries are refused, and it names acute hazardous residue, restricted-use pesticide containers and TSCA material as loads for another handler.
One of the nine commitments says the yard will replace or refund anything that arrives below the grade sold, without asking you for an inspection report. Contact the yard through the form if that happens.
Yes. The manifesto states plainly that cutting a UN-marked container voids the rating, and grinding the plate off ends it. The yard says so even when the customer would rather it did not.
Each of these is auditable, and several customers have audited them. The circular standard turns them into dated commitments with numbers attached.